关于死刑的雅思作文及解析

死刑是否应该存在是比较有争议性的话题，你的想法如何呢？下面小编给大家带来关于死刑的雅思作文及解析。

关于死刑的雅思作文范文

Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?死刑是控制社会暴力的必要手段，你同意还是不同意呢?

Capital punishment is the sentence of death, or practice of execution, handed down as punishment for a criminal offence. The topic, however, remains highly controversial. Abolitionist groups and international organizations argue that it is fruitless in curbing the worst criminal actions, while proponents claim that it is an effective and necessary deterrent for the most heinous crimes. It is necessary to put some thoughts into this issue.

Those who oppose death penalty might doubt the deterrent effect of it. They argue that many criminals may actually find the prospect of the death penalty less daunting (and thus, less effective as a deterrent) than spending the rest of their lives suffering in jail. Death by execution is generally fairly quick, while a lifetime in prison can be seen as a much more intensive punishment.

Other people, however, insist that the worst crimes deserve the most severe sanctions. Capital punishment symbolises the value and importance placed upon the maintenance of the sanctity of sacred human life. Any lesser sentence would fail in this duty. For example, first-degree murder involves the intentional slaughter of another human being. Such a heinous crime can only be punished,in a just and fair manner, with the death penalty.

I, personally, back up the necessity of capital punishment on the grounds that, in addition to the argument in the preceding paragraph, death penalty can help ease the problem of overcrowded prisons in many countries, where keeping people for life in prison contributes to expensive and at times unconstitutional overcrowding. As such, the death penalty may be preferable to life in prison since it helps alleviate a pressing problem in the criminal justice system. It is better to execute those who deserve it than to be forced to release dangerous offenders into society because prisons are overcrowded by people serving life sentences.

　　雅思写作大作文考官范文：死刑

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment in essential to control violence in society.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Model Answer:

Before talking about the essential role of death penalty, you have to think about the meaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment. If you consider that the purpose is to prevent the guilty from being nasty again, you can be seduced by an argumentation in favour of the suppression of capital punishment. But you have to think about another aspect of the problem: a punishment is also useful to impress people, to make them fear the law. In fact, let's take the example of a young misfit, which has grown in a violent atmosphere, influenced by older delinquents, etc ... He lives in the streets, he's got no aim but to survive. This is the kind of person who could possibly kill someone for money, or even for fun ... Why would he fear prison? Life would be easier for him there. In addition, in many cases, when you behave normally, you can benefit from penalty reductions. This young misfit needs to be impressed, he needs to know that the law is a frontier. When you cross it, you can lose your life. That is why capital punishment helps keeping a distance between robbery and murder. If you abolish it, you suppress the difference between these two types of crime, which are completely different.

But there is also a limit to define: even if death penalty is unavoidable, it would be a crime to apply it to inadequate cases. If there is no premeditation or past facts which can justify such a punishment, it is far too strict to apply death penalty. That is why the lawmakers have to establish precisely the context in which capital punishment car be pronounced. That is the price to pay to limit violence without using excessive violence.

　雅思大作文范文：死刑与监禁

By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Model Answer 1: (Agree)

"Do as I say, not as I do." This is what society tells us when it punishes murderers with the death penalty. Society tells us that murder is wrong, and in our legal system, murder is against the law. Yet we still see our society kill murderers, and thus we are committing murder ourselves. For this reason, the death penalty should end, and instead murderers should be punished with life in prison.

Society needs to show a positive model of how our lives should be and how people should act. We should always strive to improve our situation, to be at peace and in harmony with others. However, when we kill murderers, we are not working to improve our society. Instead, we are stooping to the criminals' level.

It makes me think about the revenge that came when playing games with my brothers. When we were kids/children, my brother would take my toys, so I would hit him and take my toys back. Then he would hit me harder and take the toys again. Thinking of the death penalty, I imagine a murderer kills someone. Society takes revenge by killing the murderer. This leaves behind the murderer's family and friends, who have tremendous anger inside of them, which they may release onto society. The cycle of killing goes on and on.

Society should not condemn people who are taking the same action that society is taking. Society tells us not to kill, and yet society kills when it exercises the death penalty. Because of this contradiction, we should end the death penalty and instead punish murderers by sentencing them to life in prison.

Model Answer 2: (Disagree)

I strongly support the death penalty for murderers. In today's society, life is very violent. There are many mentally-ill people committing crimes and almost nothing will stop them. We have interviewed captured criminals who say, "I was going to kill him, but I knew that I could get the death penalty if I did. So I just left him there." Obviously, having the death penalty saves lives and that makes a positive difference to society.

If a criminal does murder someone, and then gets the death penalty, that isn't society's fault. Everyone knows about the death penalty as a punishment for murder. So, the person who murders is really killing himself at the same time he is killing his victim. The murderer has made the choice to die.

It is important to remember that the death penalty is used only for people who have committed very serious crimes. For example, a woman shot a police officer when she was trying to escape from jail. She was already a convicted criminal when she committed murder, and she deserves the death penalty.

People need to accept responsibility for their actions. Punishing murderers with the death penalty is one way that society can help people to realize/realise the consequences of their decisions.

　雅思大作文观点解析之死刑能震慑罪犯吗?

Should capital punishment be a major deterrent to crime?

Arguments

1. There should never be suspicion~ of capital punishment.

2. Murderers whose motive~ is money should not get off lightly. It is absolutely wrong to think professional killers are insane and need hospital treatment.

3. Criminals must be made to see the consequences of their crimes. "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" is the very basis of justice.

4. Capital punishment is more hmnane because the criminal does not suffer the torture of life imprisonment.

5. Only the return of the death penalty can ensure that people can sleep safely in their beds.

6. Murderers are not humane and, therefore, they cannot expect to be treated as hmnans.

7. Capital punishment should be a major deterrent. Other strict laws should also be put into practice.

8. A hfe sentence is only a nominal sentence. It leaves a chance for the criminal to escape.

9. Those who are lenient to criminals are unkind to innocent people.

10. We shouldn't be blinded by emotional argmnents, which leads to relaxation of harsh laws.

Counter-arguments

1. Capital punishment should not be a major deterrent. Emphasis should be put on the reform of criminals.

2. It has been proved many times in the past that the relaxation of harsh laws has never led to an increase in crime. Therefore, the "deterrent" argument is absurd: capital punishment never protected anyone.

3. Those in favour of capital punishment are motivated only by a desire for revenge and retaliation~.

4. There has been a marked trend in society towards a more humane treatment of less fortunate members. The same attitude characterizes our approach to crime.

5. Suspension of capital punishment is enlightened~, civilized and humane.

6. Crime can only be drastically reduced by the elimination of social injustices--not by creating socalled "deterrents" when the real problems remain unsolved.

7. It is illegal to murder, but are we justified in taking away the life of the murderer? No. Capital punishment helps create a bloody world.

8. He who never errs does not exist. The death penalty leaves no chance for first offenders to reform.

9. Murderers vary. Some kill people only to defend themselves while others are trigger-happy. It is unfair to give the death penalty to every murderer.

10. Some criminals can be reformed if they are handled properly. The death sentence leaves criminals no hope at all.